Vicki Cook didn't complain that her son took welfare from the county, she complained that he was required to show identification! Of course someone who receives low income aid to the needy should show identification - how else can government easily determine if the person is an illegal alien?
"My son had to show his ID to get a breast pump from the county health nurse. What's wrong here?"
My first thought of what is wrong is that your allegedly conservative family is complaining about taking government welfare.
"This is an impeachable offense, loosing our AAA credit rating and increasing our debt by $5 trillion."
Not only is a debt downgrade not an impeachable offense, CONGRESS is responsible for spending bills.
Vicki Cook is a Romneyite Mormon who apparently will vote for the gun-grabbing liberal Willard Mitt Romney. Read her entire rant here.
Friday, November 2, 2012
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Debra Irvine Will Not Cut Spending
Debra Irvine is registered as a Republican, but she talks like a liberal Democrat. Debra's quotes about how she will support big government.
Debra Irvine believes in an overbearing nanny state:
We need to defend reasonable regulations ...
Conservatives who would like a tax cut will need to pay for the cut through reduced spending. That won't be happening with Debra Irvine, because Debra Irvine believes in big budgets and big government spending:
... asked where she's prepared to take an ax to the state budget if elected, her answer is simple: she'd rather not.
Debra also thinks the government should tax everyone to pay for advertising. Why not allow those companies who need advertising to do their own advertising? Government-funded advertising, as promoted by Debra Irvine, is a subsidy to favored industries:
She said she would be a strong advocate for tourism in Denver ...
There are plenty of choices on the ballot for big-government spenders. Conservative Republicans should take a pass over big-government Debra Irvine.
Debra Irvine believes in an overbearing nanny state:
We need to defend reasonable regulations ...
Conservatives who would like a tax cut will need to pay for the cut through reduced spending. That won't be happening with Debra Irvine, because Debra Irvine believes in big budgets and big government spending:
... asked where she's prepared to take an ax to the state budget if elected, her answer is simple: she'd rather not.
Debra also thinks the government should tax everyone to pay for advertising. Why not allow those companies who need advertising to do their own advertising? Government-funded advertising, as promoted by Debra Irvine, is a subsidy to favored industries:
She said she would be a strong advocate for tourism in Denver ...
There are plenty of choices on the ballot for big-government spenders. Conservative Republicans should take a pass over big-government Debra Irvine.
Nanny-Government Debra Irvine
Debra Irvine does not believe in individual liberties and individual responsibilities. Debra believes in a big-government nanny state, and she manipulates statistics as talking points. Debra Irvine will work against the will of the people of the State of Colorado, who passed a medical marijuana initiative over a decade ago.
Her local paper lets Debra Irvine describe how she is a big government liberal:
Irvine cited an increase in the number of school suspensions and expulsions this year because of the use or possession of marijuana. She is concerned Colorado will become a distribution center, because we will be the only state in the nation that will have legalized marijuana.
Note the allegation of an increase, without citing any real statistics. Her concern about the State becoming a distribution center shows that instead of thinking of the State, she will be thinking about the federal government. Is she running for state house or is this a stepping stone for her to achieve a bigger throne and bigger crown?
Her local paper lets Debra Irvine describe how she is a big government liberal:
Irvine cited an increase in the number of school suspensions and expulsions this year because of the use or possession of marijuana. She is concerned Colorado will become a distribution center, because we will be the only state in the nation that will have legalized marijuana.
Note the allegation of an increase, without citing any real statistics. Her concern about the State becoming a distribution center shows that instead of thinking of the State, she will be thinking about the federal government. Is she running for state house or is this a stepping stone for her to achieve a bigger throne and bigger crown?
Friday, September 14, 2012
Elizabeth Wickert Is Not Conservative
Elizabeth Wickert is an immigrant who is registered as a Republican. She is the secretary of the Summit County GOP.
She wrote a letter to the local newspaper in which she implied support for baby killing:
"Women in the Republican Party represent both ‘pro-choice' and ‘pro-life' positions..."
A Democrat called out Ms. Wickert for being a hypocrite, and closed the letter with, "This is why the Hard Right in this country must be defeated."
First she implies support for baby killing, then she motivates a Democrat to write a letter to the newspaper, and the letter includes a call to arms "must be defeated". Way to go Ms. Wickert on activating your opposition. Or maybe the Democrats aren't really your opposition because you are a big-government liberal who is registered Republican because you support endless foreign intervention and killing.
She wrote a letter to the local newspaper in which she implied support for baby killing:
"Women in the Republican Party represent both ‘pro-choice' and ‘pro-life' positions..."
A Democrat called out Ms. Wickert for being a hypocrite, and closed the letter with, "This is why the Hard Right in this country must be defeated."
First she implies support for baby killing, then she motivates a Democrat to write a letter to the newspaper, and the letter includes a call to arms "must be defeated". Way to go Ms. Wickert on activating your opposition. Or maybe the Democrats aren't really your opposition because you are a big-government liberal who is registered Republican because you support endless foreign intervention and killing.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Morgan Liddick Advocates For Less Competition
Morgan Liddick is registered as a Republican in Summit County, Colorado. Morgan is a big-government war-monger who is part of the welfare class (he takes a government pension). Morgan consistently supports war and big government.
In a recent article in a local newspaper, Morgan Liddick misrepresents history and advocates for the status quo.
In the mid-1970s, we had either a preview of coming attractions or a reprise of 1929 — or maybe, both. In question were the relatively new banking institutions known as credit unions – sometimes referred to as “savings and loans,” ...
Nobody confused S&Ls with credit unions. They are different and were regulated differently. There were large regulatory failures and fraud that led to the S&L crisis. Many of the S&L chiefs that committed fraud were indicted, convicted, and served prison time. The 2008 bankster bailouts have led to few prosecutions and the chiefs continuing to cash in big bonuses, at taxpayer expense.
Colorado's very own Senator Mark Udall has been working to lift federal limits on the amount credit unions can loan to business, in the teeth of past experience.
Allowing credit unions to make commercial loans will provide additional competition for the banks. Credit unions have different regulators and insurance programs than banks. The credit union regulators will provide guidelines and oversight. Competition is good, so this bill is useful.
The real issue is allowing financial institutions that are not part of the Federal Reserve System to compete against the banks. Banks, and their Federal Reserve regulator, don't want competition. By advocating against this bill, Morgan Liddick is advocating for less competition and a continuance of the rip-off by the private cartel Federal Reserve.
In a recent article in a local newspaper, Morgan Liddick misrepresents history and advocates for the status quo.
In the mid-1970s, we had either a preview of coming attractions or a reprise of 1929 — or maybe, both. In question were the relatively new banking institutions known as credit unions – sometimes referred to as “savings and loans,” ...
Nobody confused S&Ls with credit unions. They are different and were regulated differently. There were large regulatory failures and fraud that led to the S&L crisis. Many of the S&L chiefs that committed fraud were indicted, convicted, and served prison time. The 2008 bankster bailouts have led to few prosecutions and the chiefs continuing to cash in big bonuses, at taxpayer expense.
Colorado's very own Senator Mark Udall has been working to lift federal limits on the amount credit unions can loan to business, in the teeth of past experience.
Allowing credit unions to make commercial loans will provide additional competition for the banks. Credit unions have different regulators and insurance programs than banks. The credit union regulators will provide guidelines and oversight. Competition is good, so this bill is useful.
The real issue is allowing financial institutions that are not part of the Federal Reserve System to compete against the banks. Banks, and their Federal Reserve regulator, don't want competition. By advocating against this bill, Morgan Liddick is advocating for less competition and a continuance of the rip-off by the private cartel Federal Reserve.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Another Silverthorne Liberal
Bob Mayerle is a registered Republican who is really a big-government liberal. Bob does not support private property rights, and has twice wrote letters to a local paper supporting government seizure of land for recreational purposes.
Big government Bob Mayerle wrote on July 27:
... the town has spent excessive money on lawyer fees, lost a large grant to complete the recpath, and has spent a lot of time on meetings to try and work with these property owners. I think the last recourse for the town is to initiate eminent domain proceedings and be allowed to purchase (at fair market value) extended easement rights.
On August 13, Bob wrote:
If the judge rules in favor of the town, the landowner gets fair market value for their property. In this case, nothing is taken away from the landowner.
ROBERT B MAYERLE
Born 1950
(970) 468-6906
301 LAGOON LANE, SILVERTHORNE CO 80498
Big government Bob Mayerle wrote on July 27:
... the town has spent excessive money on lawyer fees, lost a large grant to complete the recpath, and has spent a lot of time on meetings to try and work with these property owners. I think the last recourse for the town is to initiate eminent domain proceedings and be allowed to purchase (at fair market value) extended easement rights.
On August 13, Bob wrote:
If the judge rules in favor of the town, the landowner gets fair market value for their property. In this case, nothing is taken away from the landowner.
ROBERT B MAYERLE
Born 1950
(970) 468-6906
301 LAGOON LANE, SILVERTHORNE CO 80498
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Silverthorne Liberals
More Republicans In Name Only have exposed themselves in Silverthorne, Colorado. While these people are registered as Republican, they actively work for big-government takeover of private property.
Brian Wray's letter to a local newspaper:
No one values personal property rights more than me. I also dislike hearing the words “eminent domain.” However, ...
Brian Wray claims to believe in property rights, and qualifies it with HOWEVER. Therefore, Brian Wray really believes in taking private property.
BRIAN L WRAY
Born 1954
Phone 970-468-0820
Home address
351 HUMMINGBIRD CIRCLE
SILVERTHORNE, CO 80498
Mailing address
PO BOX 642
DILLON, CO 80435
Charlie Gardner claims "reluctant" support of eminent domain. A person either supports eminent domain (forceful taking of private property) or they support private property rights. Charlie wrote a letter to a local newspaper:
... property owners who have been obstructing the the town from completing this segment of the BRT. (Blue River Trail) ... reluctantly supported the use of eminent domain to complete this segment of the BRT when the property owners left them with no other choice.
CHARLES ROBERT GARDNER
Born 1953
Home address
980 RESCOLA AVENUE
SILVERTHORNE CO 80498
Mailing address
PO BOX 24160
SILVERTHORNE, CO 80497
Brian Wray's letter to a local newspaper:
No one values personal property rights more than me. I also dislike hearing the words “eminent domain.” However, ...
Brian Wray claims to believe in property rights, and qualifies it with HOWEVER. Therefore, Brian Wray really believes in taking private property.
BRIAN L WRAY
Born 1954
Phone 970-468-0820
Home address
351 HUMMINGBIRD CIRCLE
SILVERTHORNE, CO 80498
Mailing address
PO BOX 642
DILLON, CO 80435
Charlie Gardner claims "reluctant" support of eminent domain. A person either supports eminent domain (forceful taking of private property) or they support private property rights. Charlie wrote a letter to a local newspaper:
... property owners who have been obstructing the the town from completing this segment of the BRT. (Blue River Trail) ... reluctantly supported the use of eminent domain to complete this segment of the BRT when the property owners left them with no other choice.
CHARLES ROBERT GARDNER
Born 1953
Home address
980 RESCOLA AVENUE
SILVERTHORNE CO 80498
Mailing address
PO BOX 24160
SILVERTHORNE, CO 80497
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)